Structured validation

Red Teams

Offensive security professionals who need structured output from engagements.

The Problem

Findings live in notes and screenshots. Validation is implicit. Handoff to defense teams is unstructured.

Key challenges

Unstructured findings

Notes, screenshots, and ad-hoc documentation. No standard format.

Implicit validation

Exploitation proves risk but the proof is not captured systematically.

Handoff friction

Defense teams receive findings but not remediation paths or evidence.

The Solution

Structures offensive findings into the same graph as defensive data. Validation becomes traceable. Evidence feeds directly into remediation.

Structured validation output

Traceable attack chains

Direct handoff to remediation workflows

Evidence that persists beyond the engagement

The Platform

Detection

Normalizes findings from any scanner into the shared graph.

Hardening

Creates and applies remediation with captured proof.

Offense

Validates whether findings are actually exploitable.

Governance

Maps outcomes to frameworks and generates evidence.

Oversight

Surfaces identity risk from directory services and code repos.

Classification

Catalogues data assets and applies sensitivity labels.

AI-Security

Protects AI/LLM workloads from prompt injection to supply chain.

Reasons over the security graph. Emulates threat actors, validates attack paths, predicts emerging risk.

Next industry

Government & Defense